judgement

Showing posts with label judgement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label judgement. Show all posts

Why A Federal High Court Ordered Deregistration of ADC, Accord Party, APP, AA, ZLP

Why A Federal High Court Ordered Deregistration of ADC, Accord Party, APP, AA, ZLP




A Federal High Court Monday ordered the electoral umpire to deregister the African Democratic Congress (ADC), the Accord Party and three other political parties.

Justice Peter Lifu issued the directive to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) while delivering judgement in a suit instituted by the Incorporated Trustees of the National Forum of Former Legislators.

Justice Lifu predicated his decision on the grounds that the affected political parties did not meet Section 225 of the Constitution.

The other political parties the court directed the electoral body to deregister are the Action Peoples Party (APP), Action Alliance (AA), Accord Party (AP), and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP).

The National Forum of Former Legislators had, in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/2637/2026, prayed the court to determine whether INEC has a constitutional obligation to remove political parties that fail to meet the electoral performance thresholds set out in Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), as reinforced by the Electoral Act 2022 and INEC’s regulations.

It was the position of the plaintiff that the five political parties listed as defendants in the matter had persistently failed to meet the constitutional benchmarks required to retain their registration.

The former legislators stressed that the requirements include winning at least 25 per cent of votes in a state during a presidential election or securing at least one elective seat at the national, state, or local government level.


They told the court that the ADC and the four other parties performed poorly in both the 2023 general elections and by-elections conducted by INEC, thereby failing to win seats across key tiers of government.

The litigants insisted that the continued existence of these five political parties as recognised political parties is unlawful and undermines the integrity of the country’s electoral system.

Among other reliefs, the plaintiff urged the court to declare that INEC is duty-bound to deregister such parties.

It further urged the court to compel the commission to deregister the five political parties before preparations for the 2027 elections advance further.

Beyond declaratory reliefs, the plaintiff prayed the court to restrain the five affected parties from participating in general elections or engaging in political activities such as campaigns, rallies, and primaries.

It also sought a court injunction restraining INEC from recognising or dealing with the parties in any official capacity unless and until they strictly comply with constitutional provisions.

The judgment may affect the chances of candidates of the affected political parties, including former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, to contest the 2027 presidential poll.

Incumbent Governor of Osun State Ademola Adeleke if the Accord Party may be facing major political setback.

It's hopeful that such judgement will be challenged at the Appeal Court.

Opposition political parties have been facing disorganization, sponsored disorderliness and brutal infiltrations and attacks including using the judiciary like never before in the political history of this country under the Bola Tinubu led pro terrorists government.  The security, Sociopolitical and economy of the country remains unsafe and uncertain as more than majority of the citizens are wallowing in abject poverty in the face of insecurity already destined the incumbent ruling party to lose the 2027 general elections.




A Federal High Court Monday ordered the electoral umpire to deregister the African Democratic Congress (ADC), the Accord Party and three other political parties.

Justice Peter Lifu issued the directive to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) while delivering judgement in a suit instituted by the Incorporated Trustees of the National Forum of Former Legislators.

Justice Lifu predicated his decision on the grounds that the affected political parties did not meet Section 225 of the Constitution.

The other political parties the court directed the electoral body to deregister are the Action Peoples Party (APP), Action Alliance (AA), Accord Party (AP), and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP).

The National Forum of Former Legislators had, in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/2637/2026, prayed the court to determine whether INEC has a constitutional obligation to remove political parties that fail to meet the electoral performance thresholds set out in Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), as reinforced by the Electoral Act 2022 and INEC’s regulations.

It was the position of the plaintiff that the five political parties listed as defendants in the matter had persistently failed to meet the constitutional benchmarks required to retain their registration.

The former legislators stressed that the requirements include winning at least 25 per cent of votes in a state during a presidential election or securing at least one elective seat at the national, state, or local government level.


They told the court that the ADC and the four other parties performed poorly in both the 2023 general elections and by-elections conducted by INEC, thereby failing to win seats across key tiers of government.

The litigants insisted that the continued existence of these five political parties as recognised political parties is unlawful and undermines the integrity of the country’s electoral system.

Among other reliefs, the plaintiff urged the court to declare that INEC is duty-bound to deregister such parties.

It further urged the court to compel the commission to deregister the five political parties before preparations for the 2027 elections advance further.

Beyond declaratory reliefs, the plaintiff prayed the court to restrain the five affected parties from participating in general elections or engaging in political activities such as campaigns, rallies, and primaries.

It also sought a court injunction restraining INEC from recognising or dealing with the parties in any official capacity unless and until they strictly comply with constitutional provisions.

The judgment may affect the chances of candidates of the affected political parties, including former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, to contest the 2027 presidential poll.

Incumbent Governor of Osun State Ademola Adeleke if the Accord Party may be facing major political setback.

It's hopeful that such judgement will be challenged at the Appeal Court.

Opposition political parties have been facing disorganization, sponsored disorderliness and brutal infiltrations and attacks including using the judiciary like never before in the political history of this country under the Bola Tinubu led pro terrorists government.  The security, Sociopolitical and economy of the country remains unsafe and uncertain as more than majority of the citizens are wallowing in abject poverty in the face of insecurity already destined the incumbent ruling party to lose the 2027 general elections.

Why Court nullifies INEC guidelines, says political parties have till September 2026 to submit membership register

Why Court nullifies INEC guidelines, says political parties have till September 2026 to submit membership register

The Abuja Division of the Federal High Court on Thursday invalidated guidelines by the Independent National Electoral Commission mandating political parties to submit a register and database of all members on May 10 to be eligible to contest for the 2027 general elections.


Justice M.G. Umar delivered the judgement in a suit filed by the Youth Party, compelling INEC to follow the 120 days pre-election deadline prescribed by the Electoral Act 2026 for the submission of party registers.


“A Declaration is made that having regards to Section 29(1) of the Electoral Act, 2026 which requires political parties to submit the personal particulars of their candidates not later than 120 days to an election, the Defendant cannot lawfully abridge or limit that statutory period by prescribing a shorter time frame in its 2027 elections,” stated the judgement.


All registered parties, according to Mr Umar, have until September to submit an updated list of all party members, nullifying the initial May 10 deadline.


The judgement gives politicians, who have lost primary elections in their respective parties, the leeway to defect to another political party to continue their ambitions.


The presidential and national assembly elections have been scheduled for January 16, 2027 while governorship and state Houses of assembly polls are set to hold on February 6, 2027.


The Abuja Division of the Federal High Court on Thursday invalidated guidelines by the Independent National Electoral Commission mandating political parties to submit a register and database of all members on May 10 to be eligible to contest for the 2027 general elections.


Justice M.G. Umar delivered the judgement in a suit filed by the Youth Party, compelling INEC to follow the 120 days pre-election deadline prescribed by the Electoral Act 2026 for the submission of party registers.


“A Declaration is made that having regards to Section 29(1) of the Electoral Act, 2026 which requires political parties to submit the personal particulars of their candidates not later than 120 days to an election, the Defendant cannot lawfully abridge or limit that statutory period by prescribing a shorter time frame in its 2027 elections,” stated the judgement.


All registered parties, according to Mr Umar, have until September to submit an updated list of all party members, nullifying the initial May 10 deadline.


The judgement gives politicians, who have lost primary elections in their respective parties, the leeway to defect to another political party to continue their ambitions.


The presidential and national assembly elections have been scheduled for January 16, 2027 while governorship and state Houses of assembly polls are set to hold on February 6, 2027.


CTC of an Abuja High Court which sacked Mr Julius Abure & instructed INEC to recognize Senator Nenadi Usman as the ONLY authority to represent Labour Party, Nigeria

CTC of an Abuja High Court which sacked Mr Julius Abure & instructed INEC to recognize Senator Nenadi Usman as the ONLY authority to represent Labour Party, Nigeria

 The Certified True Copy (CTC ) of the 21st January 2026 Judgment of an Abuja High Court which Ordered the sacking of Mr Julius Abure and instructed the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to recognize Senator Nenadi Usman as the ONLY authority to represent Labour Party, Nigeria. Share widely!





 Federal High Court 9 Abuja FCT Affirms Abure's Sack Orders INEC To Recognize Nenadi Usmans As National Chairman of Labour Party (LP) in Line with the Supreme Court Judgement of 4th April 2025

Wednesday 21st January, 2026

IN THE FEDERAL HIGH COURT ÀBUJA
IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION

SUIT NO: FHC/ABJ/CS/2262/25

BETWEEN

SENATOR ESTHER NENADI USMAN v. INEC

BEFORE: 
Hon Justice Peter Lifu (JP) (Court 9 Federal High Court, FHC, Abuja FCT)

PARTIES:
Plaintiff Present

APPEARANCES:
1. Innocent L. Adoo, Esq. with F.O. Akoh, Esq. and O.M. Offiah, Esq. (For the Plaintiff)

2. Adamu Bello, Esq. holding the brief of O.A.Adeyemi, Esq. (1st Defendant.)

3. O.V. Akowe, Esq.,  ( for the 2nd, 3rd & 4th Defendant)

4. Marshal  Abubakar, Esq., with Tamuno Tonye Ekundayo, Esq. (For the 5th Defendant i.e party sought to be joined) NLC
 
SUMMARY:

The matter is for Judgement. In his judgement My Lord ruled that the Supreme Court  Judgement of 4th April, 2025 had addressed the issue of Leadership of the Labour Party (LP) in it's landmark Judgement in Suit No: 
SC/CV/56/2025. 

He further stated that the issue of locus standi does not arise. 

The objections of the Defendants cannot succeed. 

(1). Questions raised by the Plaintiff are answered in the affirmative. 

(2). It is an internal affair of the party conducted by the STATUTORY National Executive Council (NEC) Resolution of 18th July 2025 in line with ARTICLE 13 and 14 of Labour Party (LP) Constitution 2019 as amended and the court cannot interfere.

(3). INEC is urged to recognize the Plaintiff as the ONLY VALID representative of the party and accord her all privileges while accepting all processes and correspondence emanating from same pending the conduct of Congresses and National Convention of the party. 

(4). No order as to cost.

 The Certified True Copy (CTC ) of the 21st January 2026 Judgment of an Abuja High Court which Ordered the sacking of Mr Julius Abure and instructed the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to recognize Senator Nenadi Usman as the ONLY authority to represent Labour Party, Nigeria. Share widely!





 Federal High Court 9 Abuja FCT Affirms Abure's Sack Orders INEC To Recognize Nenadi Usmans As National Chairman of Labour Party (LP) in Line with the Supreme Court Judgement of 4th April 2025

Wednesday 21st January, 2026

IN THE FEDERAL HIGH COURT ÀBUJA
IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION

SUIT NO: FHC/ABJ/CS/2262/25

BETWEEN

SENATOR ESTHER NENADI USMAN v. INEC

BEFORE: 
Hon Justice Peter Lifu (JP) (Court 9 Federal High Court, FHC, Abuja FCT)

PARTIES:
Plaintiff Present

APPEARANCES:
1. Innocent L. Adoo, Esq. with F.O. Akoh, Esq. and O.M. Offiah, Esq. (For the Plaintiff)

2. Adamu Bello, Esq. holding the brief of O.A.Adeyemi, Esq. (1st Defendant.)

3. O.V. Akowe, Esq.,  ( for the 2nd, 3rd & 4th Defendant)

4. Marshal  Abubakar, Esq., with Tamuno Tonye Ekundayo, Esq. (For the 5th Defendant i.e party sought to be joined) NLC
 
SUMMARY:

The matter is for Judgement. In his judgement My Lord ruled that the Supreme Court  Judgement of 4th April, 2025 had addressed the issue of Leadership of the Labour Party (LP) in it's landmark Judgement in Suit No: 
SC/CV/56/2025. 

He further stated that the issue of locus standi does not arise. 

The objections of the Defendants cannot succeed. 

(1). Questions raised by the Plaintiff are answered in the affirmative. 

(2). It is an internal affair of the party conducted by the STATUTORY National Executive Council (NEC) Resolution of 18th July 2025 in line with ARTICLE 13 and 14 of Labour Party (LP) Constitution 2019 as amended and the court cannot interfere.

(3). INEC is urged to recognize the Plaintiff as the ONLY VALID representative of the party and accord her all privileges while accepting all processes and correspondence emanating from same pending the conduct of Congresses and National Convention of the party. 

(4). No order as to cost.

Statement from the Labour Party: Today's Judgement Is a Victory For Democracy And Rules Of Law

Statement from the Labour Party: Today's Judgement Is a Victory For Democracy And Rules Of Law


The Labour Party has received with profound joy and relief the judgment of the Federal High Court, which ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to immediately recognise Senator Nenadi Usman’s leadership as the only valid, authentic, and legitimate leadership of the Labour Party.


The party notes that today’s judgment represents a victory for democracy, for the Labour Party, and for the Nigerian people, and not a personal victory for Senator Nenadi Usman nor for any individual officer of the party.


Although the journey to this point was protracted, difficult, and at times turbulent, the Labour Party urges its members and supporters not to celebrate with triumphalism. Rather, this moment should be embraced as a solemn opportunity for genuine reconciliation. For us, it is a no victor, no vanquished moment. Let it be clearly stated: there is only one united and indivisible Labour Party in Nigeria. This judgment must mark a new beginning anchored on unity, healing, and collective progress.


Accordingly, the Labour Party calls on all members who may feel aggrieved by the current state of affairs - including those against whom today’s judgment was delivered - to sheathe their swords and embrace dialogue in the supreme interest of the party.


The party extends an olive branch to all contending tendencies within its fold. We sue for peace, plead for dialogue, and seek sincere reconciliation. There is enormous work ahead in rebuilding the Labour Party into a strong, credible, and virile opposition platform in Nigeria, a task that can only be accomplished in an atmosphere of unity, cohesion, and mutual respect.


In furtherance of this commitment to peace and reconciliation, the party shall immediately constitute a Truce and Reconciliation Committee mandated to engage all aggrieved members and restore lasting harmony within the party.


Furthermore, as a law-abiding institution and a major stakeholder in Nigeria’s democratic process, the Labour Party calls on INEC to end all unnecessary distractions by fully complying with today’s judgment and according Senator Nenadi Usman’s leadership the formal recognition clearly and unambiguously directed by the court.


Finally, the Labour Party congratulates its supporters across the nation for their resilience, steadfastness, and unwavering faith in truth and justice, even at moments when hope appeared lost. We also commend our team of lawyers for their professionalism and diligence, and express our gratitude to the judiciary for once again standing firm as the last hope of the common man.


 *Ken Eluma Asogwa* 

Senior Special Adviser, Media,

to the Interim National Chairman

of the Labour Party,

Senator Nenadi Usman


21st January, 2026


The Labour Party has received with profound joy and relief the judgment of the Federal High Court, which ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to immediately recognise Senator Nenadi Usman’s leadership as the only valid, authentic, and legitimate leadership of the Labour Party.


The party notes that today’s judgment represents a victory for democracy, for the Labour Party, and for the Nigerian people, and not a personal victory for Senator Nenadi Usman nor for any individual officer of the party.


Although the journey to this point was protracted, difficult, and at times turbulent, the Labour Party urges its members and supporters not to celebrate with triumphalism. Rather, this moment should be embraced as a solemn opportunity for genuine reconciliation. For us, it is a no victor, no vanquished moment. Let it be clearly stated: there is only one united and indivisible Labour Party in Nigeria. This judgment must mark a new beginning anchored on unity, healing, and collective progress.


Accordingly, the Labour Party calls on all members who may feel aggrieved by the current state of affairs - including those against whom today’s judgment was delivered - to sheathe their swords and embrace dialogue in the supreme interest of the party.


The party extends an olive branch to all contending tendencies within its fold. We sue for peace, plead for dialogue, and seek sincere reconciliation. There is enormous work ahead in rebuilding the Labour Party into a strong, credible, and virile opposition platform in Nigeria, a task that can only be accomplished in an atmosphere of unity, cohesion, and mutual respect.


In furtherance of this commitment to peace and reconciliation, the party shall immediately constitute a Truce and Reconciliation Committee mandated to engage all aggrieved members and restore lasting harmony within the party.


Furthermore, as a law-abiding institution and a major stakeholder in Nigeria’s democratic process, the Labour Party calls on INEC to end all unnecessary distractions by fully complying with today’s judgment and according Senator Nenadi Usman’s leadership the formal recognition clearly and unambiguously directed by the court.


Finally, the Labour Party congratulates its supporters across the nation for their resilience, steadfastness, and unwavering faith in truth and justice, even at moments when hope appeared lost. We also commend our team of lawyers for their professionalism and diligence, and express our gratitude to the judiciary for once again standing firm as the last hope of the common man.


 *Ken Eluma Asogwa* 

Senior Special Adviser, Media,

to the Interim National Chairman

of the Labour Party,

Senator Nenadi Usman


21st January, 2026

OPINION: Supreme Court Judgement is a Strategic Victory for the Forces of Reconciliation, Consensus in Labour Party — Okunniyi

OPINION: Supreme Court Judgement is a Strategic Victory for the Forces of Reconciliation, Consensus in Labour Party — Okunniyi

 INTERVENTION ON SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT OVER LP CRISIS 



Today's Supreme Court Judgement is a Strategic Victory for the Forces of Reconciliation and Consensus in Labour Party. 


However, these forces must be immediately proactive and sarvvy in order not to be outsmarted and boxed into the previous Bobby traps of INEC and APC forces over the Party. 


Today's Judgement, though a major victory for the Labour Party, will only be of any significance and make the Party formidable, if LP stakeholders can courageously seize and explore the strategic vista for reconciliation unwittingly openned for the Party by the supreme Court before INEC strikes again


It can only be preposterous and foolhardy for LP stakeholders to continue to battle themselves into the hands of their enemies and predators to the detriment of the Party relevance in the formation of opposition coalition for the 2027 élections. 


Olawale Okunniyi

Veteran Che

DG, NC the Front

4/4/25

 INTERVENTION ON SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT OVER LP CRISIS 



Today's Supreme Court Judgement is a Strategic Victory for the Forces of Reconciliation and Consensus in Labour Party. 


However, these forces must be immediately proactive and sarvvy in order not to be outsmarted and boxed into the previous Bobby traps of INEC and APC forces over the Party. 


Today's Judgement, though a major victory for the Labour Party, will only be of any significance and make the Party formidable, if LP stakeholders can courageously seize and explore the strategic vista for reconciliation unwittingly openned for the Party by the supreme Court before INEC strikes again


It can only be preposterous and foolhardy for LP stakeholders to continue to battle themselves into the hands of their enemies and predators to the detriment of the Party relevance in the formation of opposition coalition for the 2027 élections. 


Olawale Okunniyi

Veteran Che

DG, NC the Front

4/4/25

Court Orders Final Forfeiture of Abuja, Kano Properties

Court Orders Final Forfeiture of Abuja, Kano Properties


The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC on Thursday, April 3, 2025 secured a final forfeiture of two properties to the federal government before Justice Obiora Egwuatu of the Federal High Court, Abuja. The properties are located in FCT, Abuja and Kano state.


Both properties which are linked to Aminu Sidi Garunbabba, a senior staff of the Federal Inland Revenue Services, FIRS are a four bedroom terrace masonite with boys quarter, situated in Barumark Groove Estate, Plot 667 Cadastral Zone BO3, Wuye District, Abuja and the other at N0 5 Lodge Road, Kano State.


The order was given following a motion ex-parte for their final forfeiture, dated March 16, 2022 and filed by the Commission, through its counsel, Ekele Iheanacho, SAN, pursuant to Section 44(2) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Section 17 of Advance Fee Fraud and other Related Offences Act, No 14, 2006.


 


The court had on February 16, 2022, granted an interim forfeiture order of the properties and directed the publication of the order in a national newspaper to make for any interested party to show cause as to why the properties should not be finally forfeited to the federal government.


Moving the motion for the final forfeiture order at Thursday’s sitting, the prosecution counsel informed the court that the property was reasonably suspected to have been acquired with proceeds of unlawful activities.


However, the defence counsel in a preliminary objection, raised concerns that a public officer cannot be investigated and prosecuted when an ongoing administrative disciplinary action is yet to be concluded.


Justice Egwatu after listening to the submissions of the counsel dismissed the objection and granted the request of the prosecution for a final forfeiture.


The judge held that the matter was a non-conviction based forfeiture which is different from a criminal charge that targets an individual and the simultaneous actions do not amount to abuse of court process.


“This case targets properties suspected to be proceeds of crime, the two cases are different. A criminal case requires proving beyond reasonable doubt while in this case, only a suspicion suffices. Both actions can go on simultaneously and one cannot abate the other. The parties are different, the target in both cases are different, one is proved beyond reasonable doubt and the other is reasonable suspicion. The issues are also different, a person cannot be allowed to benefit from illegitimate acts. The respondent failed to show any reasonable cause that the funds used in purchasing the property is from his legitimate earnings, so the request for final forfeiture is granted”


The journey to the final forfeiture started with EFCC’s intelligence that unraveled the corrupt activities of staffers of FIRS who conspired among themselves and defrauded the Service of millions of naira under the guise of Duty Tour Allowances for non-existence trips.



Source: EFCC 


The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC on Thursday, April 3, 2025 secured a final forfeiture of two properties to the federal government before Justice Obiora Egwuatu of the Federal High Court, Abuja. The properties are located in FCT, Abuja and Kano state.


Both properties which are linked to Aminu Sidi Garunbabba, a senior staff of the Federal Inland Revenue Services, FIRS are a four bedroom terrace masonite with boys quarter, situated in Barumark Groove Estate, Plot 667 Cadastral Zone BO3, Wuye District, Abuja and the other at N0 5 Lodge Road, Kano State.


The order was given following a motion ex-parte for their final forfeiture, dated March 16, 2022 and filed by the Commission, through its counsel, Ekele Iheanacho, SAN, pursuant to Section 44(2) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Section 17 of Advance Fee Fraud and other Related Offences Act, No 14, 2006.


 


The court had on February 16, 2022, granted an interim forfeiture order of the properties and directed the publication of the order in a national newspaper to make for any interested party to show cause as to why the properties should not be finally forfeited to the federal government.


Moving the motion for the final forfeiture order at Thursday’s sitting, the prosecution counsel informed the court that the property was reasonably suspected to have been acquired with proceeds of unlawful activities.


However, the defence counsel in a preliminary objection, raised concerns that a public officer cannot be investigated and prosecuted when an ongoing administrative disciplinary action is yet to be concluded.


Justice Egwatu after listening to the submissions of the counsel dismissed the objection and granted the request of the prosecution for a final forfeiture.


The judge held that the matter was a non-conviction based forfeiture which is different from a criminal charge that targets an individual and the simultaneous actions do not amount to abuse of court process.


“This case targets properties suspected to be proceeds of crime, the two cases are different. A criminal case requires proving beyond reasonable doubt while in this case, only a suspicion suffices. Both actions can go on simultaneously and one cannot abate the other. The parties are different, the target in both cases are different, one is proved beyond reasonable doubt and the other is reasonable suspicion. The issues are also different, a person cannot be allowed to benefit from illegitimate acts. The respondent failed to show any reasonable cause that the funds used in purchasing the property is from his legitimate earnings, so the request for final forfeiture is granted”


The journey to the final forfeiture started with EFCC’s intelligence that unraveled the corrupt activities of staffers of FIRS who conspired among themselves and defrauded the Service of millions of naira under the guise of Duty Tour Allowances for non-existence trips.



Source: EFCC 

Poster Speaks

Poster Speaks/box

Trending

randomposts